US President Donald Trump’s assertions of achieving peace in the Middle East are seen as far-fetched. The stability of the region is not solely dependent on Gaza but also on areas like the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran’s response to a potentially revamped Israel-Palestine relations.
The process of persuading Hamas to agree to the peace deal and the subsequent years needed for its implementation, including the reconstruction of Gaza, pose significant challenges. Hamas is required to relinquish power, weapons, and financial resources, potentially leading to a choice between leaving Gaza or embracing a peaceful coexistence.
Critics argue that Trump has given Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu a free hand to act as he sees fit if Hamas rejects the plan. The deep-rooted animosity and lack of trust could lead to major obstacles and a potential resurgence of conflict, offering Israel a favorable position.
Rather than a comprehensive peace initiative, the plan appears more as an ultimatum to Hamas. Trump has signaled that if Hamas refuses to comply, Netanyahu has the authority to take necessary actions.
Addressing the radicalized fighters and terrorists, who have experienced years of violence and suffering, will require extensive efforts to deradicalize them and their associates, fostering a willingness to abandon rebellion.
The concept of a two-state solution, favored by many nations as a just resolution, remains contingent upon meeting all stipulations, rebuilding Gaza with economic zones, establishing a new police force, and forming a Palestinian governing body.
Although the plan has its flaws and uncertainties, it represents a significant step towards ending the longstanding conflict that erupted in October 2023. The hope is that the people of Gaza, exhausted by the cycle of death and destruction, will push for the permanent dissolution of Hamas and uphold the terms of any agreement.
While acknowledging the potential pitfalls of the plan, it is recognized that it is still in its early stages and heavily favors Israeli interests. The vagueness of the plan allows room for both sides to disrupt it. Despite its imperfections, for now, it might be the best achievable solution in the ongoing peace efforts.