Andy Burnham has once again criticized Keir Starmer, expressing his belief that now is not the appropriate time to introduce digital ID cards. The Mayor of Greater Manchester has been causing a stir at the Labour Party’s annual conference, where speculation has arisen that he might be a potential future successor to Starmer.
During a live event hosted by the Guardian Politics podcast, Burnham was questioned about his stance on digital ID, to which he responded, “Not now.” He also refrained from definitively addressing inquiries about his potential transition from mayor to MP, fueling rumors of his ambition to lead the Labour Party.
While Burnham declined to disclose any discussions with MPs regarding a leadership bid, he emphasized his inability to launch such a campaign without parliamentary status. His critique of the proposed digital ID cards is part of his recent outspokenness at the conference, where he has also advocated for scrapping the two-child benefit limit and proposed reforms in taxation policies.
The so-called “BritCards” unveiled by Starmer are set to be non-compulsory but practically mandatory for adults seeking employment or accommodations in the UK. These digital IDs, intended to be stored on smartphones through the GOV.UK app, aim to streamline verification processes for individuals’ right to reside and work in the country.
Furthermore, Burnham called for a reevaluation of the current tax system, emphasizing the need to balance the taxation of work and wealth more equitably. He defended his economic proposals, including a 50p top rate of income tax and a tax reduction for lower earners, asserting his financial competence in running Greater Manchester.
Amid his engagements at the event, Burnham expressed hopes of the UK rejoining the EU in the long term, advocating for the benefits of being part of unions. He also raised concerns about a “climate of fear” within the Labour Party hindering open discussions on governmental direction, urging for a more inclusive and transparent approach under Starmer’s leadership.
In conclusion, Burnham clarified that his motives for speaking out were not driven by a desire for leadership but by a genuine intention to spark constructive dialogues about the party’s future direction.