A United States congressman has suggested that Jeffrey Epstein might have arranged for more women to meet Andrew Mountbatten Windsor than just Virginia Giuffre. Democrat Suhas Subramanyam, as part of an investigation into the ‘Epstein Files’, a list of individuals associated with the convicted sex offender, disclosed that survivors of Epstein’s activities had provided evidence linking Andrew and other influential figures.
Subramanyam, a member of the House Oversight Committee overseeing the inquiry, stated that there are indications that additional individuals may have been trafficked to Andrew. He praised the courage of the survivors who shared crucial information during discussions on Capitol Hill.
In a recent development, Subramanyam, along with 15 other Democratic committee members, sent a letter to Andrew urging him to testify under oath about his knowledge of Epstein’s sex-trafficking network. This development follows allegations from the previous month that Epstein introduced Andrew to another victim of sexual abuse.
The woman in question was potentially introduced to Andrew in London in August 2010. While Andrew expressed interest in meeting her, it remains unclear if the encounter took place. Notably, Andrew has consistently denied accusations made by Mrs. Giuffre and reached a settlement with her without admitting any wrongdoing.
Subramanyam hinted that more challenges lie ahead for Andrew, emphasizing that the committee intends to call Andrew’s former security personnel and possibly his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, to provide testimony. Epstein’s estate has cooperated with the investigation, furnishing financial records that could shed light on the sex-trafficking operations.
When asked about Andrew’s potential testimony, Subramanyam emphasized the importance of transparency and vowed to uncover the truth even if Andrew refuses to cooperate. The royal source indicated Andrew’s reluctance to voluntarily testify under oath due to potential legal implications.
The scrutiny surrounding Andrew’s actions will be subject to debate in the House of Commons later this week, marking a significant development in the ongoing investigation.